I really like covers. It´s the familiarity of something we know, which is comforting, plus the excitement of something we don´t, which is intriguing. There are some songs that lend themselves beautifully to reinterpretations.
Original - Warren Zevon
I don´t think there is a single Warren Zevon song that isn´t deliciously wicked. He manages something so rare to come by, songs that are wise, funny, shocking AND make a point. And they are singalong classics!! For many folks, he´s it. His dark sense of humour and unconventional voice mean that he hasnt had the mainstream attention many think he deserves. But it´s not for them, it´s for the people who get the joke. The original has fiddle, his signature honky tonk piano style and a (naughty) verse more than most covers. All these girls won´t let him be.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TbfQPRgcS8
Cover - Linda Ronstadt
I get annoyed about how patronised Linda Ronstadt gets. Yes, she was cute-as-pie, didn´t write her own tracks and was friends with loads of the male musicians on the scene but she sure as hell wasn´t riding no coat tails! She brought half of the folks together on the scene, The Eagles (effectively her old backing band), Jackson Browne, Lowell George, JD Souther..... Anyway this fabulous does an awesome version, probably my favourite of it´s interpretations. The She´s are changed to He´s and they suddenly sound even better, delivered with buckets of fierceness. "he was a credit to his gender" suddenly sounds less mildly patronising and more like a delightful seal of vampish approval. (rapidly sealing that can of worms....... the gender debate will have to wait). Good use of twangy country guitar, quirky but not unpleasant synth sounds to kick things off, nice harmonies. Her live performance of it in ´79 at the Lowell George concert is a fun performance, although I feel it´s the kind of version that comes alive as you´re driving, you know? Your laptop speakers and a hangover won´t make it dance. All these boys won´t let her be....
Cover - Terri Clark
Things just got all country......
Now don´t get me wrong, like Leon says at Willie´s barbecue, I LUUURVE COUNTR´MUSIC. But but problem has always been with country that sounds, how do i put this..... shiny?It´s production, I get it, but the same artist could record the same song on their own in a garage and I´d like it more. This ain´t bad though, Terri´s got a strong, sweet voice, like syrup. It´s of it´s time, as opposed to the original which sounds timeless to me, but maybe thats just preference. And.........Cowbell!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3064dD-qGQ
Cover - Jackson Browne featuring Bonnie Raitt
Well, it was never going to be bad in my book.
Part of the tribute album Enjoy Every Sandwich, this is a track that Jackson sometimes plays anyway, but this hard rockin version is great fun. It starts with a much heavier backline than normal, it could turn into Fortunate Son for all we know. These two and Warren Zevon all go way back, and it´s just lovely for me to observe absolutely any interaction they have, musical or not. It´s a great cover, actually, and I like it increasingly with each listen. The only drawback perhaps, is that Jackson is too thoroughly decent a bloke. I don´t know, obviously, but i don´t imagine he could be the kind of glorious arse to write this, and therefore he doesn´t sing it in quite the way a glorious arse would, and I think that might be needed, certainly for a male interpretation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmlQUc9hQLI
musings on interesting covers
Saturday, 4 April 2015
Monday, 5 January 2015
part 4 - NO GOOD WITHOUT YOU
I really like covers. Its the familiarity of something we know, which is comforting, plus the excitement of something we don't, which is intriguing. There are some songs which lend themselves beautifully to reinterpretations.
Original - Marvin Gaye

Written by William "Mickey" Stevenson in 1965, this was simply an album track from 'How Sweet It Is To Be Loved By You'. There's a lot going on, pretty classic smooth motown instrumentation from the time with strings and all, but somehow it remains totally funky with a sweet and soulful vocal.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f88pGULut5w
Cover- The Birds

Ain't spelt it wrong, promise. The Birds were an early 60's West London group who put out a few singles on Decca. They released this at the end of their run, the same year as the original. The initial chords set the tone for what you think will be a heavy durge, but then they take it down a notch, and suddenly its just a sultry and understated plea. What I found so thoroughly interesting is that despite bringing a hard R n B edge to proceedings, they bring in backing vocals that are more Motown sounding than the original. In fact I heard this version first, knowing there was a Marvin Gaye original and fully expecting that the distinctive backing vocals were a straight mimic of the original. What makes them particularly charming is, unlike the clear Motown vocal style, there is more of a football crowd vibe about them. It's beautifully crafted, and innovative, and it actually takes the song to a different place, as a cover ideally should.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCd5hamfrpM
QI: Guess what? A young Ronnie Wood was a member of The Birds (front of pic).
Cover- Four Tops

Dear god, Levi Stubbs. So, usually I have silly arguments that lyric changes are unnecessary and disrespectful, or that one shouldn't cover a song in the same style unless you are going to improve it.... but Levi Stubbs is an exception to every rule I have. They are all tosh, and I'm a fool.
It's not that it's better than Marvin's, and it's not particularly different, but there is an inescapable Four Topsiness about it, basically it's vocally perfect. SO tight, so clean and so smooth, without ever being bland. There are definite similarities in the vocal harmonies to 'Baby I Need Your Lovin' and the strings are more prominent as is the FT way, and it's a delight.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVTntbiM55k
Cover- Paddy Klaus and Gibson

Which brings me to this little number, also from 1965. Paddy, Klaus and Gibson were a Liverpool based trio with various Beatle connections (Klaus Voorman was originally a designer who had become friends with the boys back in Hamberg, he designed the Revolver cover), and although not particularly successful, the members crop up now and again in the annals of rock history. It's not that it's bad at all, it just suffers in comprison to the others. It has a great Northern Soul beat, and is pacier than the others, but somehow it lacks the energy that the others radiate so strongly even at a much slower tempo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CJHjjMD4NU
And.... it appears this song isn't famous enough to have youtube covers. So there.
Original - Marvin Gaye

Written by William "Mickey" Stevenson in 1965, this was simply an album track from 'How Sweet It Is To Be Loved By You'. There's a lot going on, pretty classic smooth motown instrumentation from the time with strings and all, but somehow it remains totally funky with a sweet and soulful vocal.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f88pGULut5w
Cover- The Birds

Ain't spelt it wrong, promise. The Birds were an early 60's West London group who put out a few singles on Decca. They released this at the end of their run, the same year as the original. The initial chords set the tone for what you think will be a heavy durge, but then they take it down a notch, and suddenly its just a sultry and understated plea. What I found so thoroughly interesting is that despite bringing a hard R n B edge to proceedings, they bring in backing vocals that are more Motown sounding than the original. In fact I heard this version first, knowing there was a Marvin Gaye original and fully expecting that the distinctive backing vocals were a straight mimic of the original. What makes them particularly charming is, unlike the clear Motown vocal style, there is more of a football crowd vibe about them. It's beautifully crafted, and innovative, and it actually takes the song to a different place, as a cover ideally should.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCd5hamfrpM
QI: Guess what? A young Ronnie Wood was a member of The Birds (front of pic).
Cover- Four Tops

Dear god, Levi Stubbs. So, usually I have silly arguments that lyric changes are unnecessary and disrespectful, or that one shouldn't cover a song in the same style unless you are going to improve it.... but Levi Stubbs is an exception to every rule I have. They are all tosh, and I'm a fool.
It's not that it's better than Marvin's, and it's not particularly different, but there is an inescapable Four Topsiness about it, basically it's vocally perfect. SO tight, so clean and so smooth, without ever being bland. There are definite similarities in the vocal harmonies to 'Baby I Need Your Lovin' and the strings are more prominent as is the FT way, and it's a delight.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVTntbiM55k
Cover- Paddy Klaus and Gibson

Which brings me to this little number, also from 1965. Paddy, Klaus and Gibson were a Liverpool based trio with various Beatle connections (Klaus Voorman was originally a designer who had become friends with the boys back in Hamberg, he designed the Revolver cover), and although not particularly successful, the members crop up now and again in the annals of rock history. It's not that it's bad at all, it just suffers in comprison to the others. It has a great Northern Soul beat, and is pacier than the others, but somehow it lacks the energy that the others radiate so strongly even at a much slower tempo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CJHjjMD4NU
And.... it appears this song isn't famous enough to have youtube covers. So there.
Thursday, 14 March 2013
part 3 IF I WERE A CARPENTER
I really like covers. Its the familiarity of something we know, which is comforting, plus the excitement of something we don't, which is intriguing. There are some songs which lend themselves beautifully to reinterpretations.
Original- Tim Hardin
If I Were I Carpenter was written by Tim Hardin and appeared on his 1967 album Tim Hardin 2, but it had been released initially by Bobby Darin in 1966.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA0IGlvDDPY
Cover- Bobby Darin
This was a hit for Darin after a short absence from the charts. It heralded a new, folkier sound for the long time recording artist. His version (the first release of the song) is heartfelt and beautifully arranged. This live performance from 1973 is my particular favourite.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjFRLOktHXo
Cover- The Small Faces
A rockier interpretation with an epic vocal from Steve Marriot, I think it works brilliantly. Still sensitive in spite of the heaviness.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sngAEbtEAlg
Cover- Johnny Cash and June Carter
This song lends itself perfectly to a duet, which is what Cash and Carter did in 1970. It might lack the sensitivity of some other interpretations, but perhaps thats the instrumentation. Either way it's playful and enjoyable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqaQjlv0EJA
Cover- John Holt
Although i'm not much of a fan of this era of reggae (it's the synths..... I have issues with synths), it's very nicely done. Chilled and with a beautiful vocal.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G61qDnV23_Q
Cover- Leon Russell
I am biased as a massive Russell fan, but my god this is a sexy version, especially the repeated vocal fade at the close. Surprising considering the delicate, subtle arrangement. Normally i'm not a fan of lyric changes..... but the relevant word choices work in this case from a musician's perspective: 'Well I might go crazy, I have to warn you, but I get so mean sometimes, when the spirit's on me', 'Could you see the future, could you stand the losses?'
Yes, definitely willing to take the risk, yes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pyII1eSJz4
Cover- The Four Tops
A masterful interpretation from 1967, with Levi Stubbs' commanding vocal. I reckon, along with the Small Faces version, it's the inspiration for Bob Seger's also interesting version from 1972.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bW7GKeV7V2g
And for the random Youtube cover.......an interesting electronic version from Data Romance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0L-GG5ztkKk
Tuesday, 12 February 2013
part 2 YOU'VE GOT TO HIDE YOUR LOVE AWAY
I really like covers. Its the familiarity of something we know, which is comforting, plus the excitement of something we don't, which is intriguing. There are some songs which lend themselves beautifully to reinterpretations.
Original- The Beatles
You've Got To Hide Your Love Away was written by John Lennon and released on the Help! album in 1965. It's a beautiful little song, with a boisterous chorus vocal that belies the sad subject matter. Here is the video from the film Help!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKHA2AGbXtI
Cover- Eddie Vedder
Pearl Jam vocalist Eddie has been performing this solo as a warm to up PJ gigs for a while now, and he recorded it for the I Am Sam film soundtrack. Usually just him and a guitar, he does a beautiful job.Love this particular version, with self-effacing harmonica-related giggle at 2.26
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8DaqgMPrmQ
Cover- Joe Cocker
Much more of an epic production here, but in the kind of way that Cocker does so well. My first knowledge of his version is from 1991, on the album Night Calls. With stadium style drums, gospel choir and guitar solo, it should all be a bit much, but in context I think it works rather nicely.
Cover- Barry McGuire and the Mamas and the Papas
I'm not really sure of what to make of this. McGuire can never be accused of under performing, and i'm not sure he really evokes much emotion from the lyrics but it's certainly fun to watch. Here's footage from Shindig in '65.
Cover- Terence Trent D'Arby/ Sananda Maitreya
Many Beatles songs lend themselves beautifully to a soul interpretation, and this version combines this with soundtrack-style string arrangment. Personally I'm not a great fan of his voice, but the audience seem to be liking it....
From the Lennon tribute, 1990.
Cover- Waylon Jennings
I am a BIG fan of Waylon, and I always felt this song would lend itself beautifully to a countrified interpretation, but i'm not sure this works too well. The backing is twee and bland, the backing vocals sound all 1950's Disney (and not in a good way) and he changes the lyrics at one point (?!). Plus I can't stand the added syllable on 'wall'.
Cover- The Silkie
How very interesting, using a male/female dual vocal to tell the story. The Silkie were an English folk band, mostly known for their covers. I love the sweet 60's backing on this one, very mellow and tender, and with lovely harmonies. Although the woman's vocal makes me think of someone trying to sing without moving their mouth (but she is a Staffordshire girl, so she is forgiven).
Cover- The Beau Brummels
A much more interesting version with full instrumentation and backing vocals. The offbeat on the verses livens things up a bit, and Sal Valentino gives us a nicely wounded vocal. It sounds very 'of the era' which is no bad thing.
And for the random featured Youtube cover...... Julieta Venegas ft. Los Shajatos!
Inspired fiddle!! Wonderful percussion. Love this instrumentation.
There are many more versions from Tim Rose, Elvis Costello, Chris Cornell, The Beach Boys, Jan and Dean etc
Monday, 11 February 2013
part 1 SEXUAL HEALING
I really like covers. Its the familiarity of something we know, which is comforting, plus the excitement of something we don't, which is intriguing. There are some songs which lend themselves beautifully to reinterpretations.
Original- Marvin Gaye
Sexual Healing was written my Marvin Gaye and Odell Brown and released in 1982.
It is certainly very smooth soul, but it doesn't suffer from the 80's production, it's got a great groove and Marvin's vocal is top class. Here is the extended version.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fn4i8bAfnMY
Cover- Ben Harper
Ben really gets the feel of this song. Sexy but also a little desperate, regardless very seductive. This song has been popping up in his live set for years. He keeps it simple with just vocal and acoustic guitar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9uUW4jBatc
Cover- Kate Bush
When I heard about this cover I was actually a little nervous. It shouldn't really work, but I think it does. However, if you want to divide a room of music fans, put this on- there doesn't seem to be an accepted opinion, which is great. Although it's a reasonably recent release, she has kept that 80's synth meandering for the verses. The surprise is the Uillean pipes in the chorus. Yep, that happens.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aL3PjNTqwU
Cover- Hot 8 Brass Band
One of my favourites, this time from 2007. Inspired. The New Orleans collective more than do this justice. Mostly instrumental, but the guys come together on a loose vocal around 2.38s. It has a great groove and feels like a celebration.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s75WIkQBYzk
Cover- Hot Chip
Certainly different. I think I would quite like this one, if there was less of whatever delay/repetition effect they've got going on with the vocals. Alexis Taylor's vocals are nice and vulnerable which works, but I think it's the least sensual version. The percussion arrangement is pretty interesting though.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8ZKvnrZ-VY
Cover- George Michael
Now from my point of view, this is a pointless cover, as it's not a re-imagining in any way. It's very faithful, but that's the problem. If you you can't sing it better than Marvin and you are just recreating the backing track, what's the point? It's probably good for a George Michael fan who likes this song. He's got a voice on him, so we will let him off.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1G8NXR96sQ
And for the random featured youtube cover..... Greg and Brandon Hurt!
A sweet dual guitar instrumental. Lovely.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4YKjMQMa2s
And I'm not going to include the Soul Asylum cover, because frankly I can't get through a full listen.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)























